The Relational Roots of Trauma: A Biopsychosocial Approach to Healing Through Connection - Luuk L. Westerhof, MSc

Publisert den 13. januar 2025 kl. 15:46

This paper argues that trauma is not solely an individual experience but is fundamentally shaped by relational dynamics. It explores how malfunctioning and maladaptive relationships can create and perpetuate trauma, embedding it within the nervous system. Drawing upon polyvagal theory, the concept of the social brain, and the role of oxytocin, it highlights the neurophysiological underpinnings of trauma and shame. Furthermore, it proposes an integrative biopsychosocial approach, emphasizing compassion and activating endogenous healing resources for recovery. The paper underscores that healing from trauma occurs within the context of safe, attuned relationships that counteract the maladaptive patterns established in traumatic relationships.

Introduction:

Trauma, often defined as experiences that overwhelm an individual's capacity to cope, is increasingly understood not as an isolated event but as a complex phenomenon deeply embedded within relational contexts. While traumatic events themselves are harmful, the impact is significantly amplified when they occur within dysfunctional or abusive relationships. Maladaptive patterns of interaction, emotional unavailability, and chronic conflict all contribute to a nervous system that is perpetually on high alert, leading to enduring trauma. This paper explores this perspective, drawing on current research in neuroscience, psychology, and social sciences to highlight the interconnectedness of trauma, relationships, and the body. It argues that healing cannot be achieved in isolation but requires re-establishing safe, connected relationships that cultivate self-compassion and activate endogenous healing mechanisms.

Trauma and the Relational Matrix:

Traditional approaches to trauma often focus on the individual as the primary site of pathology. However, as van der Kolk (2014) has argued, "the body keeps the score," and those scores are often written by the relational dynamics experienced. Experiences of abandonment, neglect, or abuse, particularly in early life, result in profound alterations in neurological pathways. The nervous system becomes primed for threats, leading to hypervigilance, anxiety, and difficulties in forming healthy attachments (Siegel, 2012). These are not isolated symptoms but rather signals of a system reacting to the overwhelming pain and insecurity created within those maladaptive relational experiences.

The Polyvagal Theory: Understanding the Nervous System's Response to Threat:

Stephen Porges's polyvagal theory provides a valuable framework for understanding how trauma impacts the nervous system. It emphasizes the critical role of the vagus nerve in regulating social engagement, safety, and defense responses (Porges, 2011). In safe relationships, the ventral vagal pathway promotes calm, connection, and social engagement. However, in the face of danger, the sympathetic nervous system activates fight-or-flight responses, while the dorsal vagal pathway can lead to dissociation, freeze, and shutdown. Chronic exposure to threatening relational dynamics can result in the overactivation of these defensive systems, leaving individuals stuck in patterns of hyperarousal or hypoarousal. This persistent state of dysregulation reinforces trauma responses even in the absence of immediate danger.

The Social Brain and the Need for Connection:

Humans are inherently social beings, and our brains are wired for connection. The "social brain," encompassing regions like the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and insula, is critical for processing social cues and regulating emotions (Cozolino, 2014). Traumatic relationships disrupt the functioning of these brain regions. When early attachment figures are unreliable or abusive, the brain struggles to form secure attachments and develop the capacity for trust. This can lead to difficulties in interpersonal relationships throughout life, as the brain defaults to defensive strategies developed in the context of those early, trauma-laden interactions.

Oxytocin: The Love Hormone and Its Role in Trauma Recovery:

Oxytocin, often referred to as the "love hormone," plays a significant role in facilitating bonding, trust, and emotional regulation. It promotes the ventral vagal system and reduces anxiety and stress. Research suggests that individuals with secure attachments tend to have higher levels of oxytocin during moments of connection (Carter, 2017). Conversely, trauma, particularly relational trauma, can disrupt the oxytocin system, making it difficult to form and maintain healthy relationships. This disruption highlights the vital role of nurturing and safe relationships in counteracting the neurophysiological effects of trauma.

The Repetitive Nature of Trauma: Frozen in Time:

The profound impact of relational trauma lies in its repetitive nature. The body memorizes coping patterns developed in dangerous situations, even if they are no longer adaptive. These patterns become ingrained in the nervous system, and specific behaviors, emotional responses, and somatic sensations resurface in response to triggers that trigger the original trauma. As Levine (2010) describes, these responses can feel as if they are “frozen in time,” with the body reacting as if it is still in the original traumatic experience. The individual may struggle to understand why they respond in particular ways, unaware that these responses are deep-seated survival mechanisms that once made sense within a specific relational context.

Shame: The Neurophysiological Shadow of Trauma:

Shame, often a prominent feature of trauma, is not merely an emotion; it is a body-based experience with neurophysiological roots. It is linked to the activation of the dorsal vagal pathway, leading to immobilization, disconnection, and self-loathing (Nathanson, 1992). Experiences of chronic shaming, especially in childhood, can result in a profound sense of being inadequate, unlovable, and unworthy. This shame profoundly impacts the sense of self, making individuals less likely to seek help and more likely to perpetuate cycles of relational dysfunction.

An Integrative Biopsychosocial Approach to Healing:

Healing from trauma requires a multifaceted approach that addresses the biological, psychological, and social dimensions of the experience. The integrative biopsychosocial model recognizes the intricate interplay of these factors and avoids reducing trauma to a purely individual pathology.

  1. Compassion: Compassion for oneself and others is critical for healing. It involves recognizing the impact of trauma on the nervous system and understanding that maladaptive patterns are survival mechanisms, not character flaws. Self-compassion has been shown to reduce shame and promote emotional resilience (Neff, 2011)
  2. Endogenous Healing Resources: The body has an innate capacity for self-healing. Trauma therapy aims to activate these endogenous healing resources through practices that promote safety and regulation. Somatic therapies (Levine, 2010; Ogden, Minton & Pain, 2006), mindfulness practices (Kabat-Zinn, 1990), and movement are tools that help individuals connect to their bodies and regain a sense of agency.
  3. Attuned Relationships: The most fundamental element of recovery lies in establishing safe and attuned relationships. Repairing safe attachment and learning to experience safe connection promotes the ventral vagal pathway, counteracting the maladaptive patterns learned in traumatizing relationships. Therapeutic relationships that offer empathy, validation, and consistent presence can provide a reparative experience, fostering a new sense of safety and trust.

Conclusion:

Trauma is not an isolated experience but an embodied narrative written within the context of relationships. Malfunctioning and maladaptive relationships can create and perpetuate trauma, embedding it in both the nervous system and the sense of self. This paper has argued that healing from trauma requires a shift from an individual-centric focus to a relational perspective. Drawing on insights from polyvagal theory, social neuroscience, and the role of oxytocin, this paper emphasizes the critical need for compassion, activation of endogenous healing resources, and engagement in safe, attuned relationships. By acknowledging the relational roots of trauma, we can foster more effective approaches to healing and break cycles of suffering.

 

References:

  • Carter, C. S. (2017). Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human sociality. Annual review of psychology68, 1-26.
  • Cozolino, L. J. (2014). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delta.
  • Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice : How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.
  • Nathanson, D. L. (1992). Shame and pride: Affect, sex, and the birth of the self. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Neff, K. (2011). Self‐compassion, self‐esteem, and well‐being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass5(1), 1-12.
  • Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the body: A sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

 

Legg til kommentar

Kommentarer

Det er ingen kommentarer ennå.